Arjuna's Dilemma
Verse 1.35
एतान्न हन्तुमिच्छामि घ्नतोऽपि मधुसूदन। अपि त्रैलोक्यराज्यस्य हेतोः किं नु महीकृते।।1.35।।
etān na hantum ichchhāmi ghnato ’pi madhusūdana api trailokya-rājyasya hetoḥ kiṁ nu mahī-kṛite
Word Meanings
etān—these; na—not; hantum—to slay; ichchhāmi—I wish; ghnataḥ—killed; api—even though; madhusūdana—Shree Krishna, killer of the demon Madhu; api—even though; trai-lokya-rājyasya—dominion over three worlds; hetoḥ—for the sake of; kim nu—what to speak of; mahī-kṛite—for the earth
Translation · English
These I do not wish to kill, O Krishna, even though they kill me, for the sake of dominion over the three worlds; leave alone killing them for the sake of the earth."
Deep Meaning · English
In this moment of profound existential crisis, Arjuna addresses Krishna as 'Madhusudana,' the slayer of the demon Madhu. This is not merely an epithet of respect; it is a subconscious cry for help. By invoking the one who destroyed an external demon, Arjuna is implicitly asking Krishna to slay the internal demons of attachment, fear, and confusion that are currently paralyzing his spirit. Arjuna’s declaration that he would not kill his kin even for the rule of the three worlds signals a total renunciation of worldly gain in the face of moral dissonance. He is stuck in the duality of 'mine' and 'thine,' prioritizing familial bonds over the cosmic order (Dharma). This hesitation serves as the essential stage-setting for the Gita, illustrating the human condition where the intellect is blinded by emotional entanglement, requiring the light of Divine Wisdom to transcend personal grief and align with the higher purpose of existence. From the Advaitic perspective, Arjuna’s struggle reflects the struggle of the individual soul (Jiva) trapped in the illusion of worldly hierarchies. He sees himself as a perpetrator of violence and his kin as objects to be destroyed, failing to recognize the indestructible nature of the Self. This verse marks the nadir of his despair, transforming his personal tragedy into a universal inquiry into duty, non-attachment, and the nature of reality.
When personal attachment eclipses Dharma, even the promise of ultimate worldly sovereignty becomes insignificant, signaling the need for a shift from ego-centered action to divinely guided duty.
Connected Verses
The ultimate resolution of Arjuna's initial refusal, where he chooses to surrender his own judgment to the Divine will of Krishna.
Krishna emphasizes that performing one's own duty imperfectly is superior to performing another's duty, addressing the internal conflict Arjuna faces here.
Arjuna moves from this state of personal confusion to a formal surrender, acknowledging his role as a disciple seeking the truth.
Krishna counters Arjuna's hesitation by framing the battle as a sacred duty, shifting the focus from personal ethics to universal Dharma.
Community Insights
(0)Share your understanding of this verse with fellow seekers.
No insights yet. Be the first to share your understanding of this verse.